This is not funny...this is disturbing. Young college students, given orders in the middle of the night to attend events and handout information that they blindly support, and obviously, as the video shows, have no knowledge of what they are supporting.
If this isn't disturbing enough, check out the below link to see where Organizing For America (formerly mybarackobama.com) has infiltrated U.S. High Schools with their applications for volunteer programs. These indoctrination programs have the following books listed as recommended reading by the students:
Rules For Radicals by Saul Alinsky
The New Organizers by Zac Exley
Dreams of My Father Chicago Chapters by Barack Obama
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/01/atlas-exclusive-obama-organizing-for-communism-and-youth-corps-in-the-public-school-1.html
Anyone still have their head in the sand??
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Explanation of Types of Government...Must Watch!!
This is a non-partisan explanation of different types of government. It does an excellent job of explaning, in simple terms, the different methods of governing. Wake up, we are a republic, not a democracy.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Jon Stewart On Obama's 6th Grade Class Teleprompter! Very Funny!
You know it's bad when well known liberals are poking fun at your incompetence.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Obama Speaks to a Sixth-Grade Classroom | ||||
| ||||
Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death...Timeless
Are there any leaders like this in our congress today? Patrick Henry didn't have a teleprompter to walk him through this either.
Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death
Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.
No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
Monday, January 25, 2010
Nancy Pelosi Is A Horrible Person...Even Leftist Network CNN Says So.
The video speaks for itself. Seriously, California...you can't find someone better than this to represent your state??? I wouldn't hire her to run a Pizza Hut, yet she is Speaker of the House.
Not to be forgotten is that this is not an isolated incident. Ms. Nancy has a history of pampering herself on our hard earned tax dollars. In early 2009, Department of Defense emails were released which detailed interactions between military officials and staffers for Queen Nancy. They painted quite a picture of the Speaker and her minions treating the Air Force as her and her families' personal taxi service. I have included the link to the article from judicial watch below.
Her Highness, Ms. Pelosi, is up for election this year. California, more specifically San Francisco...is this really who you believe represents your beliefs?? Unfortunately, polling would show that she does. It is hard to believe that there is an entire district of people that far out of touch with reality.
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
MA- Scott Brown vs. Martha Coakley..Where They Stand
In discussing senate races, it would only be fitting to first discuss what has become quite a race in MA. The fact that Scott Brown (R) is within single digits of Martha Coakley (D) says wonders about how fed up Americans are getting with the liberal-statist majority. Most polling has the two in a dead heat at this point.
It cannot be overstated how important this race is. If Brown could pull off the upset on January 19th he would eliminate the filibuster-proof majority the democrats have in the senate. The only question at that point would be whether the liberals delay his swearing-in in order to pass their unconstitutional healthcare plan.
Here is where they stand on the issues:
SCOTT BROWN (R)
Healthcare- Supports healthcare reform, but against Obamacare.
Economy- Supports lower taxes and free market
Energy and Environment- Supports alternative energy development, is against Cap and Trade Legislation.
Education- Supports choice throught charter programs and METCO, providing lower income students with more educational opportunities.
Immigration- Opposes amnesty, and believes in strengthening border enforcement. Supports legal immigration.
Veterans- Supports better benefits for returning service members and for family members of those killed in action.
Guns- Supports the 2nd Amendment
Death Penalty- Believes in Capital Punishment
Abortion- Pro-Choice, against partial-birth abortions and supports parental consent and notification.
Marriage- Believes in traditional marriage, but believes individual states should be allowed to decide for themselves.
Israel- Supports Israel, supports a two state solution
Iran- Believes in isolating leader as an outcast until he gives up nuclear ambitions.
http://www.brownforussenate.com/issues
MARTHA COAKLEY (D)
Healthcare- Supports Obamacare
Economy- investments in health care, energy and education; and restoring fiscal accountability to government spending, believes in mroe financial regulation and laws to rpohibit predatory lending.
Energy and Environment- Believes in global warming and supports Cap and Trade legislation.
Education- Supports improving teacher compensation, supports changing the charter system
Immigration-???
Veterans- Supports better benefits for returning service members and for family members of those killed in action.
Guns- ???
Death Penalty- Opposes the death penalty
Abortion- Pro-Choice
Marriage- Supports government recognized same sex marriage
Israel- Supports Israel, supports a two state solution
Iran- Supports bilateral talks with Iranian leader
I could not find a firm stance on immigration or gun control on her webpage.
http://www.marthacoakley.com/about/Issues
From a conservative standpoint the choice here is obvious...LET'S GET SCOTT BROWN IN THE SENATE MASSACHUSETTS!!!
Martha Coakley can't even spell M-A-S-S-A-C-H-U-S-E-T-T-S
By the way, I just love negative attack ads which make idiotic statements like, "candidate umptyfratz will deny medical care to rape victims." REALLY!!! HONESTLY!!! Does anyone seriously believe any candidate, democrat or republican, would support such a thing??? How stupid do politicians really think we are??
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)