Well we have now completed three
missions. This last mission was somewhat of a repeat of mission two
in that we were at the same location. That is where the similarities
end as we did not have the same problem with the tram. No, we had an
entirely different set of problems today which have me at my wits
end.
Okay, how do I get into this next topic? How can I explain
this in a somewhat tactful manner? I am the second in command on
these missions. My boss is the Convoy Commander and he is a Captain.
He and I have very differing opinions in regards to security. He is
a very difficult man to work with, as he refuses to take advice from
anyone, including his senior advisor, aka myself. I am the Assistant
Convoy Commander, but more importantly I carry a second billet of
Security Team leader. It is actually the entire reason myself and my
personnel are up here with this convoy and work crew in the first
place. We are the security experts assigned specifically to keep
these personnel safe on their worksite, as well as during the
movements from place to place. It is what we train almost every day
to do. Yet, Captain...let's call him “Custer,” insists on
running everything and taking advice from no one.
He made two
decisions on this last mission that dismounted troops from the safety
of their up-armored vehicles unnecessarily, placing all in greater
danger during a time of darkness when our convoy was halted
unexpectedly. These were not questionable calls whatsoever. They
were decisions that were 100% wrong, 99% of the time. I knew before
approaching him after the convoy that my advice would fall on deaf
ears, nonetheless, I felt a moral obligation to approach him and get
my concerns into the air. Yes, I knew he would immediately become
defensive and would never admit that my security tactics were
correct, much less admit that his decisions were incorrect.
That is
precisely how it played out, with him again dismissing my concerns
with his favorite defense line, “That was a risk I was willing to
take.” This is becoming an extremely difficult position for me. I
can continue pointing out the glaring errors, knowing full well that
his pride and arrogance will never allow for him to accept that he is
wrong about anything. Eventually this will lead to disaster when we
become just fed up enough with each other to throw down one evening.
I am 40 years old now and the prospect of “throwing down” with
anyone just sounds like a bad idea from the start.
The second option
is to let it go and let Custer rule with his iron fist. This option
seems morally reprehensible to me as each time he makes such
decisions he puts lives in danger. It may be a risk he's willing to
take but it is most assuredly not a risk I am willing to take. I do
have a third option. An option that is thoroughly frowned upon by
the structure of the military. I could go around him to the next
higher authority and let him know my concerns. This is called not
utilizing the chain of command properly, and if not done with
surgical precision, it could get me in a lot of hot water and turn me
into the bad guy. I will not sleep well tonight contemplating my
next move.
No comments:
Post a Comment